Another day, another blog .... Yesterday several things came to mind to write about. I hate to seem that I am ranting in most of my blogs, but I am hopefully provoking thought. Of course, I am not trying to irritate anyone or make enemies ... I just need to state my peace ... piece? I suppose both apply!
Last week, I went to the WorkSource office (as directed by the unemployment office.) WorkSource is another topic that I will discuss -- which I think is absolutely fabulous -- Really! It is an awesome resource with wonderful, helpful people. But this blog is about a "policy" that Worksource has that I dont necessarily agree with.
When you walk in to WorkSource, the entire office is plastered with signs saying "no personal fragrances" They go on to give examples; no cologne, Perfume, Hair spray and I believe even deodorant. Now, I know people are allergic --- I know I know I know! And I must say there are a LOT of individuals that bathe in the stuff. They wear enough for all of us to rub up against them and get a full weeks supply of scent of our own. BUT -- come on!
It's another personal liberty taken away. Just last night on the news they were discussing the very same issue. I cant remember which office was thinking of "banning" fragrance, but the concensus was similar. One woman felt it was "micro-mananging." It's like when the airlines removed peanuts from the "snacks" they handed out because "some" of the passengers were, or may have been, allergic to nuts.
It's tough because we cant ask all people that are allergic to something to live in a bubble, but it just isnt right to limit non-allergic people because of them! At Medina Elementary they have all sorts of "peanut free" "gluten free" etc .... rooms! I was concerned at first thinking, geez ... I cant make my kids a peanut butter and jelly sandwich because some other kid is allergic?? Turns out they certainly allow you to send your kids to school with those things to eat ... but they have peanut free, Gluten free, apple free, etc etc ... tables where the allergic kids can eat. My son didnt eat his Nutella and Banana sandwich there.
It just so happens that the day I went to WorkSource I spritzed a little perfume on. When I arrived and saw all of the signs I immediately became uncomfortable! I knew that I didn't reek, but my nose was overly sensitive. I was trying to smell out everyone else in the place. Is that ME that smells? Or is it the chick in front of me? Oh ... it's her for sure ... I wonder if the gal at the front desk that signs everyone in will THINK its me ... What will she do? Will she tell me to leave?
You know, while I may not agree with their policy, I certainly WOULD have (and will when I go back) adhere to it. IF they have such a policy, they should let you know when you are told to go. You are sent a packet of instructions advising you when to attend a mandatory meeting, what forms to fill out and what other procedures are. I think if they are serious about helping people get jobs, they should first make people feel as comfortable as possible ... especially on first meeting. If Fragrance is banned here, the packet should include statement about the fragrance free policy.
As for the policy itself, I believe its silly. Not everyone that uses fragrance abuses fragrance. I do believe it is just one more thing to be "taken away" from us. It's our right to wear it. Perhaps it will one day, however, create jobs. "Perfume Police." They can hire individuals to sniff out fragrance wearers and issue citations. It'll be like one of those cartoons when they grab the guy (or gal) race them to a shower and scrub them down!!! Hello, people that smoke cigarettes usually reek right after going out for a smoke ... are you gonna bust them too?
That makes me sneeze just as much as the dude wearing a gallon of old spice.
The point is, when are we going to stop picking at our freedom? I question our countries "land of the free" status more and more. If we drive, we have to wear a seatbelt (yet even school busses DONT have seatbelts??) If we ride, we have to wear a helmet, we cant use our cell-phones while we drive, we cant smoke anywhere, and now we cant wear perfume.
My mother accused me of wanting anarchy. PLEASE! I just want to smell pretty. I will write more on our freedoms being taken away. Right now, I think I will write a letter to WorkSource and the unemployment office asking them to PLEASE inform people of their non-perfume policy PRIOR to the in-your-face-on-the-spot contact. Most of us can adjust to change (is that a redundant comment?) If I have to give up one more freedom ... I'll get over it. I'm just not going to like it at first.

Happy Saturday! I just dropped my kids off for a day of snowboading ... and wish I could be there too! Alas, I shall take the kid-free opportunity to write my blog. Today? I speak my mind about "doping." My feelings are mixed on this subject, although apparently strong enough to feel the need to write about it. Sports stars do drugs. Perhaps not ALL of them take steroids or "enhancers" but ... many of them do. I would like to believe that Derek Jeter is steroid free. I also would like to believe the same of Ken Griffey Jr., Steve Nash and a few others.
Alberto Contador was busted AFTER he "won" the Tour de France. Bonds was busted, McGwire was busted, A-rods admitted it, Clemmens was a total under oath liar and was busted (he was also a womanizing pin-head but an AWESOME entertaining ball-player who loved the game) ... and Lance Armstrong has been busted. We all know that there are Thousands of Basketball players, track legends, swimmers, skiers, and of course football players that are doping!
WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL??? Yes, I know its WRONG. It is illegal. So is doing cocaine and driving drunk. Sports figures also rarely get busted for snorting coke or drunk driving. IF the sports world wants to BAN steroids the "Proper way," they should enforce it COMPLETELY.
This spontaneous testing is stupid and pointless. It is not fair to all participants. It is not fair for the guys and gals that DONT dope and it isnt fair for those that DO. What's the point of having a three week race and cummulative "winner" in Tour de France when the poor saps going to be stripped of the title months later for taking cough medicine that had a "no-no" drug in it? The other poor sap that didnt dope, didnt win or get to experience the thrill of victory, because the idiot that DID win after doping stole his opportunity ... after the fact! (?!?!) Every cyclist should be tested prior to and throughout the event. YANK EM if any drugs are found, period. It is absolutely ridiculous to bring back test results months after the official end of the race to say the winner was on drugs and therefore should be stripped of the title. Everyone loses that way.
ENFORCEMENT. TEST EVERY DAMN player, every participant, every season, every race, every off-season, all the time! That costs too much money? Take it from their salaries! They make millions of dollars ... and they SHOULD be willing to spend some of those Franklins to "PROVE" they are clean, just as awesome and WORTH the millions they make.
IF they are serious about eliminating steroid use then there should be strict diets ... and NO pharmaceuticals should be taken for a cough, cancer or a pulled muscle without first "okaying" it with the board. For that matter, everything that is ingested should be approved. Wasnt it actually supposedly some funky chocolate dessert that Contador ate that had the secret drug in it? Give me a freaking break. As in, if that was really what it was ... they're seriously going to punish the dude????? And the levels were so minuscule. On the other hand, if he really is dumb enough to use that as an excuse when he may really have purposely taken something, then he needs to be banned indefinitely. Someone that dumb shouldn't be allowed on a bicycle.
Athletes shouldn't dope. Athletes shouldn't feel the NEED to dope. I am sure there are PLENTY of athletes that don't and are presumably doing well. At a personal level, I know an individual that was once on the Italian race team. He was instructed by his doctors and team coach to dope. "Sugar water" my ass. 35 years ago! He still rides today but mostly runs. He is in his sixties and takes "grand master" in the majority of races he enters. He hasnt "doped" for nearly four decades and he is stronger and faster than most of the guys 20-30 years younger than him. He doesnt NEED to dope. And neither do any of those athletes!
Unfortunately many athletes still do it. If they are insecure enough to believe that they have to enhance themselves, it's sad ... but it is really none of my business. Those that continue to dope are poisoning their own bodies. If they are just doing it to follow doctors (coaches and sponsors) "orders" then they are weaklings. They need to grow a pair and tell them to shove off. Prove to them you're capable of greatness all by yourself. Rarely do steroids (at least physcially) hurt anyone but the person taking the drug. A rare case? The Psycho wrestler that murdered his family and then himself. It wasnt just the steroids that set that rocket off, however. That said ... If it's illegal and the officials want to control it ... then do it ... and don't do it half-ass! IF you can't test EVERYONE then quit your bitching and just let 'em play. People go to see baseball games because they love the game. They watch every minute of the Tour de France because they are enthusiasts. Sure, they have heroes ... but I doubt very much they're wondering if their hero just juiced up before the first pitch or the firing of the gun.
Millions of people will be glued to their televisions tomorrow watching the Steelers and the Packers play the mother of all football games, the holy Super Bowl. If it were discovered weeks from now (or months) that half of the players on the winning team were on steroids ... would they take away their trophy? I don't think so.

Ah, here I sit once again! I thought today I would start off by sharing some quick funny car stories. I've always enjoyed cars and driving. When I was 13, I decided it'd be fun to drive my moms car down the driveway with my best friend. We hopped in my mom's Toyota Celica hatchback, I turned over the ignition and carefully backed up to the turn-around spot. Once headed in the right direction, I put it into drive and headed down the steep twisty drive. Got halfway down and was headed into the second turn when I was met head-on with my mom and step dad! Oooops! I threw the thing in reverse and floored it! I flew backwards up the driveway. I crested the top and SLAM!! I blew over a boulder and wedged the back drivers side wheel in-between it and an evergreen. My friend was horrified. She thought I'd be in trouble for the rest of my life! Didnt actually get in trouble ... at all! Of course, my step dad was less thrilled than my mother. I think my mom was more amused at my predicament and knew that MY knowing what I did was stupid was punishment enough.
My next car adventure happened after I had to move to the Eastside. We lived in hoity toity Medina in a community of 8 homes that sat on the Overlake Golf course. We owned the second to last home in the drive. Our next door neighbors, "Fred and DeeDee," were probably in their late 50's and owned a lovely 1979 Monte Carlo. The ones that used to look a Cadillac. Anyway, Fred and DeeDee were going out of town for a few days and asked if I would like to "house-sit." I believe they offered me $10 a day to take care of the house for them. They were a really nice couple and were trying to make me feel special! Of course I jumped on the opportunity. So, after they left, I went into their house to have a look around. Now, the thought hadn't occurred to me to take their car when they were asking me to watch the house. It was when I saw the gleaming keys dangling from the hook on the kitchen wall that I thought it'd be a good idea to take the car out for a spin. I didnt take it the first day, or even the second. But the third day was just too much for me. I simply had to tame the beast. I called one of my friends, Betty, and asked if she'd like to go visit another friend of mine in my OLD neighborhood. She jumped at the chance for a little joy ride.
I want to be given credit for this bold idea. I was driving from Bellevue to Burien, at the age of 15, in my neighbors car. That's 21+ miles one-way solo (with another unlicensed friend.) Life was grand. So, off we headed. We drove to Sam's house in Burien. We hung out there for just a short while and then headed back to Bellevue. No "issues" of any sort there or back. Betty and I pulled back into the driveway, drove past the first 6 houses in the community, headed down and around the corner toward my house and Fred and DeeDees ...
And there were Fred and DeeDee. My face must have turned completely white in a half a second. WHAT the HECK were they doing home??? They were supposed to be gone until the next day!!! Oh Geez ... what do I say, what do I do?? I pulled the car up. Both Fred and DeeDee standing there. DeeDee with a cigarette in one hand, ash hanging ...
"What're you doing with the car?" Fred says to me. My brilliant instant reply ...
"There were prowlers so we took the car to Bettys house!"
They paid me for watching their house and I believe actually had me watch it again for them after that. Not another word was mentioned about my "saving their car from prowlers." Until, that is, the day that I got married on the front lawn ... some 10 years later. Of course Fred and DeeDee were invited to the wedding. DeeDee came up ... again, cigarette in hand. I think she'd also had a couple glasses of white wine. She gave me a gigantic hug, smiled and loudly laughed ...
"DO YOU REMEMBER WHEN YOU STOLE OUR CAR?"
Good times ....